Fostering Engaged Citizens for a Safer World

With the uncertainty in the world seen every day in the news, I find myself continually asking, “What can I do? What should I do?” I don’t want to be turning a blind eye if there is something I can contribute to make the world a safer place, a kinder place. One opportunity that presented itself was to take an online course offered by an international organization, World Beyond War, on ‘Unarmed Civilian Defense’. A major premise of this course is that unarmed civilian actions are just as, or more, effective in responding to aggression as armed resistance is, and with less loss of life and property, and less environmental damage. There are countries in the world that rely successfully on this concept and many historical and contemporary instances of its efficacy. One has only to look at Minnesota’s response to ICE for an example. It should be in the arsenal of every country because every citizen, including me, a senior, can contribute. 

One requirement for the successful use of Unarmed Civilian Defense is engaged citizenry. While we can wait until citizens feel they have no choice but to arise and respond such as when threatened by invasion, how much more effective it would be to have engaged citizens who recognize their responsibility and their power before a threat necessitates it. This means we must nurture citizens who are not apathetic or complacent, citizens who feel a strong sense of responsibility for their community/nation/world, and who believe that their contribution can make a difference, a difference significant enough that they are engaged and prepared to act. A citizenry that believes in their agency, individually and as communities.

This is not the case for many Canadians. Many of us feel that our actions will not make a difference. (Just look at how few of us vote!) We don’t raise citizens who feel that they can make a difference even if they try or that they have the responsibility to do so, but we could.

We can change the way we educate our young. We can move away from the current model that encourages and rewards doing what you are told, when you are told and gives the responsibility for what an individual does and learns to an external authority, the teacher. But neither should we let the pendulum swing to a model where every student does their own thing without any regard for community. We need a system that models what we want to see in an engaged, responsible citizenry. We need a system based on communities of diverse learners, of more than one age/grade/ability, who stay together long enough to form a community responsible for maintaining itself and capable of doing so, where members learn not only academics but who they are – their strengths and challenges – and what they can best offer their community and why it matters. Where learning how to manage differences and conflicts is a natural part of every day. Where stepping up and being responsible is just the way it is.

This is not as unrealistic as it may sound to the many who have never experienced anything but our current education model.  I know one example of such an education system well: Montessori. In high fidelity Montessori classes (I use ‘high fidelity’ because the label Montessori is not protected and as it gains in popularity, its name but not its substance is ‘borrowed’ for commercial purposes), in high fidelity Montessori classes, there are children/students of three different ages/grades, classes where each student stays for three years. There are activities on shelves around the room that cover all the academics, as well as equipment for caring for the environment and one another, everything from brooms and mops and buckets to table settings and cooking and dish washing equipment.

Four children gathered around a colorful world map playing an educational game
Working and learning together. (AI generated)

The adult is called a guide because they demonstrate to small groups of students the use of the materials and the inherent ideas. The students’ use of the materials or ideas ‘teaches’ the concept. The students use their initiative and their understanding of what they need, to choose what they are going to do and when they are going to do it. Students get help from, and offer help to, one another. The guide provides each student with the specific direction and assistance they need but no more. If a student has difficulty choosing appropriately the guide helps by giving direction that is specific to that individual. What develops is a community of learners where each individual is known for who they are; where everyone is on a journey, always with something new to learn academically, personally, and socially, as well as something new to offer. Balancing personal and community needs, decision making, taking responsibility, conflict resolution and peace making form a natural part of everyday life.

Another action to grow a more engaged citizenry, with more immediate results, would be to support programs such as Katimavik and the YMCA youth work and travel exchanges. Education outside the classroom is often life-changing, especially for young adults.

Katimavik Canada offers young people the opportunity to learn and work in different communities in Canada, increasing independence, knowledge of different ways and beliefs, and trust in relying on others.  In November 2025, Katimavik Canada asked the Canadian government to use the already existing Katimavik program to launch a mandated national Youth Climate Corps.

Their website details the impressive impact of their ‘National Experience’ programme:

“Through Katimavik’s National Experience, participants contribute about 30 hours per week to projects across the country, advancing climate resilience, food security, environmental restoration, and emergency readiness, while gaining job-ready skills.”

“The results:
• 96% improve leadership skills
• 94% strengthen personal resiliency
• 90% build cross-cultural competence
• 88% improve teamwork
• 84% increase civic engagement”

A Youth Climate Corps would develop engaged citizenry.

We Canadians are hearing clearly that we are no longer as secure in the world as we thought we were. While our government is increasing our military strength and securing partnerships with other middle powers, we should also be nurturing an engaged citizenry. Armed forces will never be enough on their own for a middle-power country like Canada. An engaged and responsive citizenry is a must-have, and educational experiences are one key.

What are your thoughts?

Hiroshima and Nurturing Education Change

Hope Agency Compassion Curiosity Connection

Photo by P Gere

We think that our young people need skills and they do. Skills of the hand and skills of the mind, schooling has always given these in one form or another, to a greater extent at different times. But the skills of the heart and of the spirit have not been front and centre of our education system. They have been left to religions and to family, extended family and community. But with the demise of formal religious observance, the dissolution of extended family, and the lack of deep community ties, these lessons of the heart and spirit are at the mercy of prevailing culture which no longer holds them dear. And that is a grave danger but also an incredible opportunity.

August 6 is the 80th anniversary of the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima, followed on August 9 by that of Nagasaki. As I met with some others to plan a commemorative lantern launching, I mused about what I am doing to prevent such catastrophic events again. For me the action that gives me hope is my belief in the power of change we can bring through the way we choose to educate our young. I try to carry peace in my heart, to act out of peace as I walk in the world but my hope is in the children and youth, my hope is in the power we have to influence the future through our young.

Connection, curiosity, compassion, buttressed by hope and moved by agency. Wouldn’t the world be a better place for everyone – and everything – if we made these three c’s a priority in education?

We humans are connected to everything. To everything that surrounds us – the air we breathe, the water we swallow, the food we eat, the soil that provides our food, the atmosphere that provides just the right conditions for our life. We are connected to the past that brought into being our world, our ancestors, ourselves. We are connected to the future through our children, through what we have done, contributed, taken.

When we approach life with curiosity rather than condemnation or fear we are more likely to see these connections and seek out their significance. Humans are built for inquisitiveness, for creating patterns of understanding, to seek meaning through connecting ideas. It is how we are, it is humanity’s gift.

Compassion. We don’t always get it right. In fact, although we often ignore or conveniently forget, the fact is that we humans learn through approximation, through error. Watch a child learning to walk for the first time, listen to the babbling of a child before they can form words accurately. We’re so accepting of this in children but not in adults – not in ourselves and not in others. Yet it is the way we are built. The reality is that we often make errors on our way to getting things right. Compassion – we need compassion for ourselves and for others. Compassion that comes from seeking to understand (curiosity), and realizing our connection.

What would schooling look like if we prioritized nurturing the capacity for connection, curiosity and compassion buttressed by hope and agency? Yes, our youth need intellectual and practical skills, and reasoning minds, but to use them well they must understand, viscerally, their place in the world and in time, and their capacity and duty to influence that world. What curriculums would we teach but, perhaps more importantly, how would we teach?

Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels.com

Schooling would have a different character. It might include mixed age classrooms where learning and working together were the primary activity; where observation supported the journey to mastery of skills – where grades were not given but everyone received encouragement, support and acknowledgement of their journey. It might be connected to the world but also to the community that surrounds it, multigenerational with little children bringing smiles to the elderly and receiving hugs and stories in return. With youth learning practical skills and future careers alongside adults already using them. It might be learner-centred and teacher-guided. Here are some programs that are exploring these possibilities – programs that do successfully engage the mind but also the heart and the spirit, benefiting both the student and the world.

The great power of humans is that our children are born only partially formed. They cannot walk or talk or forage for food. Their minds at birth are still learning and absorbing the environment around them. If we surround them with the attributes of a peaceful world, and prioritize connection, curiosity and compassion in their upbringing and education they can and will absorb this and create the peace our world so desperately needs.

Expanding these possibilities into a deeply entrenched educational system will not be easy but neither is it impossible. If we prioritize the conditions of peace as we educate the mind, a ceremony to release lanterns would be solely to console the souls of past victims rather than one for the souls that need consolation now and for the souls in the future that will someday need the same consolation.

Resources related to Hiroshima:

Are We Done Fighting? A book by Matthew Legge brimming with the latest research, practical activities, and inspirational stories of success for cultivating inner change and spreading peace at the community level and beyond.

Hiroshima Interpreters for Peace An organization and website filled with hope.